🔗 Share this article

The recent US national security strategy offers a misguided view of the European Union. It claims that unrestrained immigration and so-called "progressive" agendas pose an existential threat to the continent's identity. Yet, this argument is based on a serious misreading of the situation. The true danger facing Europe is not societal but technological and economic lag.

A Glaring Economic Gap Separating Europe and the US

The data paint a sobering picture. From 2008 and 2023, American economic output grew by eighty-seven percent, compared to a mere thirteen and a half percent increase for the European Union. During this period, EU GDP per capita dropped from over three-quarters to just half of the US level. Remarkably, even Mississippi now has a higher per capita income than major EU nations like Italy and France.

Today, roughly half of the global 50 largest technology firms are US-based, while only four are European.

The Technological Shortfall: The Core Question

This widening economic gap stems from stronger efficiency gains in the US, largely due to technological innovation and better use of resources. The scene of global tech dominance is overwhelmingly American. Over the past fifty years, hundreds of American startups have scaled into companies valued at more than ten billion dollars, compared with only fourteen in the European continent.

This gap prompts a pressing issue: In the race for tomorrow's sectors like AI, semiconductors, and fusion energy, what is the EU stand? Experts widely agree it is largely a two-horse race involving the US and China, with European nations entering at a clear disadvantage.

Root Causes of Europe's Technological Lag

Several major reasons account for this innovation chasm.

• Financing Ecosystem: The United States has a much more robust and agile network for funding startups. Europe still lacks a true capital markets union, a factor that caps the growth potential of emerging companies.
• Bureaucratic Hurdles: Excessive and fragmented rules hinder Europe. A US startup can introduce a product under a single set of laws to access a market of over 330 million. The EU, despite a bigger population size, is divided among twenty-seven different national regimes, creating significant internal barriers.
• Cultural Attitudes: Views on entrepreneurial failure differ sharply. In parts of Europe, a startup's collapse was once viewed with penalties, whereas in the US, it is often considered a valuable lesson.
• Military Investment: The US benefits from a tightly woven innovation pipeline linking defense and academia. Europe's chronic underinvestment in defense has weakened its capacity for pioneering research.

The Road Ahead: Grounds for Cautious Optimism

Despite these challenges, one can find reasons for hope. Policymakers are growing more conscious of the existential challenge and have started to propose serious reform. Key reports on EU competitiveness and the internal market highlight the necessity of major changes.

Given appropriate policies and regulatory reforms, these assets could support far greater degrees of business-led breakthroughs.

The continent retains considerable strengths: skilled workforce, excellent schools and universities, and premier research institutions. Alongside a large internal market and substantial household savings, these foundations have the potential to trigger a new wave of investment and entrepreneurship.

Importantly, even if Europe does not take the lead in creating cutting-edge technologies, it can still dramatically increase productivity by adopting and adapting innovations from elsewhere.

A Critical Juncture

The European Union now stands at a decisive moment. As the saying goes, economic erosion often happens "slowly, then all at once". To date, the continent's technological decline has been steady. But, without bold steps to address its structural weaknesses, today's slow erosion could give way to a sudden and irreversible decline in global economic relevance.