🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours prior to the NYC race for mayor, Michael Lange made a bold electoral prediction – not just who would win overall, but precinct by precinct. The analyst, a political analyst born and raised in the city, devoted more than ten years in progressive politics and emerged as something of a local celebrity this year for his thorough analyses into city data and polling.

He published his extremely precise prediction map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate would win although failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his newsletter, his platform. Lange possesses a talent for clever terms. He highlighted, as an example, the divide between the “commie corridor”, running from one neighborhood to Bushwick to Astoria, where he predicted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would win by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, certain media outlets and financial newspapers outrank the mainstream paper” in readership and the majority of electors favored Cuomo, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Trends and Unexpected Results

What was your night?

It was necessary since they were dropping around 200,000 votes into the system every few minutes! I felt somewhat anxious at the beginning: Mamdani was ahead the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but came two big batches of votes that came in after that and the advantage went from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, it was possible where election day turned out somewhat badly for Mamdani, where the opponent would have essentially increasing his support from the Democratic primary. However the winner added 500,000 votes to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he won. He campaigned and massively expanded his support from the primary.

Expanding Support

Where did the mayor-elect gain additional support from?

He assembled the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: diverse racially, it’s young, it’s renters and individuals squeezed by affordability. He improved significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the earlier election. Plus he further maximized his base of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He built the coalition that the left long aimed for: multiracial, youthful, renters and people struggling with costs

There were also some Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It is a genuine phenomenon, confined to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Voters in ethnic enclaves that went for the former president previously backed the progressive now. But it’s not that he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Impact

A major development of the election was the record turnout. Who benefited?

Both sides. Turnout was much greater than I had expected. I thought we might exceed 2 million, but it reached 2.3M – which is a huge number of participants. There was a substantial opposition group, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that sufficed to win.

You predicted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Right now you would say he’s likely to surpass 50%. He’s at 50.4% but remain probably 200,000 votes uncounted at that time. So I don’t think certain, but I believe it’s likely, and I hope he does because then none can claim Sliwa was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His vote completely collapsed.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any area. Not even Tottenville in Staten Island, which is like an 88% Trump area. That really surprised me. The independent held Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and plus gained many conservatives on Staten Island with a strong turnout. I think occurred a lot of tactical voting by GOP voters. They were doing it prior to Trump endorsed for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome unless Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your much mentioned left-wing base – was support for Mamdani overwhelming in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view there was a little dilution of the progressive zone in certain places like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. There, for example, the Greek landlords and residents supported the independent. So there existed a little resistance. However no, mostly the commie corridor is another huge reason why Zohran prevailed – he was polling between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the vote there was coverage on if the candidate was making inroads with the community. Any indication that he succeeded?

There are neighborhoods with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as specific locales – where he performed strongly. But in the affluent districts such as the Manhattan area, his position on Israel definitely mattered there. Similarly in the moderate communities like Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored the independent. And also, there are newcomers from Eastern Europe in the borough, who were strongly Cuomo. Therefore I don’t know if existed crazy narrative-busters on this one, but he did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what New York means politically? Will commie corridor serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that key political leaders from progressives hail from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that there will be additional examples – people will emerge from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

But I believe that each urban center in America can have similar progressive hubs. Cities are the centers of progressive influence in the nation – because youth reside there, people rent and they represent locales where people are crushed by the disparities we face.