🔗 Share this article

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “complete double standards” for campaigning against anti-smoking regulations in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

Campaign in Zambia

Correspondence acquired by reporters originating from the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the nation's political leaders requests measures restricting tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be canceled or deferred.

The company is attempting modifications of a pending law that include reductions in the recommended coverage of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on scented cigarette varieties, and diminished punishments for any firms breaking the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“If I was a politician, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” stated Master Chimbala.

Thousands of residents a year die from tobacco-related illnesses, according to World Health Organization estimates.

The campaigner stated the letter was known to have been circulated to several government departments and was in distribution within public interest organizations.

Global industry interference concerns

This occurs during broader worries about corporate intervention with health policies. Last month, global health authorities raised concerns that the smoking product companies was increasing attempts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“We see evidence of industry lobbying everywhere. Tobacco company fingerprints are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN international gathering,” commented the corporate monitoring director.

Potential consequences

“If a tobacco control measure doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the price could be paid in human lives who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The anti-smoking legislation being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and requiring that pictorial cautions cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

Via documentation, BAT suggests this be lowered to less than half “according to global guideline limits”, deferred for no less than twelve months after the bill passes.

International experts specifically advises a warning should cover at least fifty percent of the cigarette package face “and seek to occupy as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. In the UK, warnings are required to occupy 65% of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Flavored tobacco discussion

The company seeks the withdrawal of extensive controls on flavoured tobacco products, arguing that it would push consumers toward “illegally traded” products. The corporation recommends restricting fewer varieties of “tastes inspired by desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been banned in the UK since 2020.

The draft bill proposes sanctions for multiple violations “varying from a portion of yearly revenue to a decade in prison”.

Corporate defense

In the letter, the corporate leader of British American Tobacco Zambia states the corporation is focused on responsible corporate conduct” and “supports the objectives of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the connected wellbeing effects” but asserts that “some regulations can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Critic response

Chimbala said the company's suggested modifications would “undermine this law so much that the necessary effect for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that numerous similar measures were present in the UK, where the corporation is based, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he commented.

“We live in a global village. When I cultivate smoking products in my garden and gather the crop and sell it out – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to enrich myself and all the subsequent offspring while my neighbor's family are succumbing … is in itself complete moral bankruptcy.”

Public health laws in the United Kingdom or other countries had not caused companies to close, Chimbala said. “Regulations don't close the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Standard business position

A BAT Zambia spokesperson stated: “The company operates its activities following with applicable local laws. Additionally, the corporation engages in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the suitable systems which provide for stakeholder participation in regulation development.”

The corporation remained “not against rules”, the representative commented, noting that underage people should be safeguarded against obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We support progressive regulation to achieve intended public health goals, while accepting the variety of entitlements and duties on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” the spokesperson stated, adding that the corporation's recommendations “represent the situation of the African nation's economy and smoking product business, which includes growing volumes of illegal commerce”.

Zambia’s department of economic activities and commercial operations was contacted for response.